Thursday, December 31, 2020

20 - 029 Digitising the A Digital Human.

 So let us just remind ourselves of the objective of the Digital Human. It is to create a complete digital facsimile of a real living human. The vision I have is that you can zoom in on this digital copy going right down to the atomic level. This applies to every single component that makes up the living human. But importantly you can allow this digital human to live and therefore change with you being able to witness all these changes digitally. This includes all the things that move within the human body (eg blood, hormones etc) along with all the things that are resident within the body. (eg viruses, bacteria etc). Change includes the growth and decay phases of living and finally to death. All this to be digitally defined. From the first cells growing after conception to the final death of all the cells marking the end of that life.

You will be able to have different “lens” over this living digital human. The visual lens showing all the components the same way you would see them under a microscope and down to what you would see through an electron microscope. Another “lens” would allow you to see the human body from a purely chemical perspective. The same atoms that you can see visually but with them chemically identified. Then what I have termed the wireless “lens” where you can view everything on either side of the visual spectrum. Wireless is too simpler a term to use but because it is so easily understood it is the term we will use generically. But it covers a huge spectrum with the true wireless band only forming part of this wide spectrum. This covers a huge spectrum of impulses that run across space ranging from ultra violet through to visible light (to us) to infrared to the electric and to wireless wave bands. In addition the all the mysterious wave forms in between these defined bands. You do have to appreciate the concepts of consilience to appreciate that these “wireless” entities do form part of us as living organisms. Although scientifically they remain very unexplored and researched parts of biology. There will be the sceptics who claim these areas as being nonsense believing it to belong to pseudoscientific or occult thinking. But there are so many amazing feats in nature not fully explained that it is important to keep an open mind. Sitting her with my laptop connected via WiFi to a web server sited in California instantly communicating information would have been viewed as witchcraft in the 17th Century. Let along face timing someone sitting on an aeroplane flying over the Canadian snow covered wastelands. What will be our capabilities in 2120?

So back to basics. So whilst I can visualise this real living human I am struggling to understand how we are going to define the digital human digitally. It is going to be a visual thing. But it is also going to be a data thing in support of the visualisation. So I can see the outputs from CT scanners and electron microscopes giving me loads of visual material. I can see loads of chemical analysis giving me the chemical “lens” on these visual. I can even see the wireless “lens” superimposed on the visual and chemical “lenses”. But I want to get to the digital code. Will digital be enough? Will need something more quantum to get to the final mathematical definition of life. So the search starts of this mathematical (code) “lens” on human life. But it is not just human it is life itself.

In 2020 my digital searching for existing “digital resources” to support my digital objectives has lacked any real structure. In truth I don’t see anyone pulling it all together the way I envisage it needs pulling together. But then I am retired Information Analyst really a product of the commercial computer world just now dabbling into the life sciences. I don’t even know where to start looking to support my mental adventure. So not surprisingly I started with Wikipedia. I started to look up human genes on Wikipedia and was impressed to find that this “open systems” approach to knowledge gathering had started the process in respect of these genes in 2007. You suddenly realise you are not alone in this world. In fact thousands are just thinking like me and you if you are reading these words.

So Wikipedia became a key source of knowledge in support of building up the digital resources in respect of the Digital Human. But it obviously fails to map it all together in a structured way rather being designed to support you dipping in and out looking up facts. The links then supporting you searching linked facts allowing you to grow your understanding. But not in a zoom and out way. The search than started at looking at information stored within the biological research organisations. The research papers and the research databases. Unless I am completely missing something this is very fragmented. National boundaries come into play along with government establishments, research establishments, universities, commercial organisations and publishing organisations.

 

The one digital resource that I particularly focused upon was produced by the US National Library of Medicine and the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This is a truly amazing resource. You could search on 40 plus major information entities. It is also very information technology user friendly. Future blogs will investigate these information entities further but for now just consider one of these entities PubMed.

PubMed is a free resource supporting the search and retrieval of biomedical and life sciences literature with the aim of improving health – both globally and personally.

The PubMed database contains more than 30 million citations and abstracts of biomedical literature.

PubMed has been available to the public online since 1996.It was developed and is maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), at the U.S National Library of Medicine (NLM),located at the National Institutes of Health (NIH.).

In 2020 alone 100,000 articles alone were added on Covid-19.

For now I will just include the link below so you can take a look at this huge digital resource. In terms of me looking to build my Digital Human this at present appears to be the most comprehensive freely available resource. The plan in 2021 is for this Digital Human blog to try and map some of these resources into my overall Digital Human digitised map.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

20 - 028 Biological Coding Systems

 As someone outside of mainstream biological research this whole subject of how biological things are coded remains very confusing to this Digital Human. It does appear to be evolving but at the same time there appears many competing establishments looking to establish some standards for the coding of these biological entities. The term establishments is used in the broadest possible sense since there appear to be a number of these attempting to establish their standards as defacto. It has to be accepted that this is a very broad subject with each of the biological entities under constant change either due to deeper scientific analysis or biological evolution itself. For example consider the deeper identification of protein structures along with the annual mutation of flu viruses. So the depth of scientific investigation and analysis runs deeper whilst running in parallel with forever ongoing biological evolution. Against this is the variety of the biological entities covering genes, bacteria, viruses, hormones and antibodies for a start. Combine this with projecting these entities across species from human, monkey, mouse, bird to plants and algae you can just imagine the complexity.

Here I just want to touch the surface of this whole subject of biological, meaning living, entity definition. This whole subject has been called bioinformatics. In defining the Digital Human this is going to form one of the major foundations. It is probably no surprise that much of this work has been focussed upon understanding diseases since this gives the research a defined objective rather than it being just pure research. It also supports funding initiatives particularly when aligned with the commercial objectives of the pharmaceutical industry. Medicines and drugs themselves require their own entity definitions and classifications in parallel to the work on living entities. So just consider one database covering gene diseases.

So just take a look at the link below for a Gene Disease Database

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Disease_Database

Now you can appreciate reading my Digital Human blogs that many of my links are to Wikipedia. Being an “amateur biologist” but “professional information expert” outside of the research, academic and pharmaceutical spheres of knowledge I find the simple way things are described in Wikipedia really beneficial. But you have to note that many people engaged in these establishments object strongly to the “open” nature of contributions to this Wikipedia resource where strong “peer” review and validation processes are not applied by biological academia or research experts. Being honest when I read the academic and scientific research papers that can to be easily found these days on the internet I am often confused by the content. This in in no way intended to undermine this critical and valuable work. Only to say the words written don’t steer my personal Digital Human consciousness in any sort of constructive way. I just don’t understand them. Consider this old posting (July 2008) since it does provide a good beginners insight into the subject of the Gene Wiki.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443188/

The plan is not to spend too much time on this subject here since this is one of the last Digital Human blogs of 2020 and these are areas of bioinformatics that are going to be investigated more deeply in 2021. But I wanted to include, more for myself than for your benefit, a few pointers that require further investigation by me the Digital Human in 2021.

Covid-19 has been a big driving force in terms of this Digital Human’s consciousness during 2020 and I am sure this will apply to 2021. Now wearing my Information Analyst’s hat back in March 2020 I always referred to it as the Coronavirus then the media started to label it Covid-19 which has remained its popular identifier for the last 9 months. Now this is the name of disease caused by the virus whilst the virus itself has been labelled as SARS-CoV-2.

Now a new mutant variant of this has been detected on the 20th September 2020. For some reason this has been labelled VUI-202012/01. It has been initially based upon statistical evidence which appears to show it is more easily transmitted.

For details of this use the link below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variant_of_Concern_202012/01

So what trains of thought did it set off in this Digital Human’s thinking? So to be more transmittable it must be more effective at entering the human cells. It propagates itself making more of itself within the cell it has entered before moving out of the destroyed cell to enter into more human cells. It repeats the propagation through the digital human body. It appears the human cells in the respiratory system are the first targets and most easily entered. But that is because these are the most easily got out having entered the nose and mouth. But once inside the lungs with access to blood circulation and the heart systems it can penetrate the gastrointestinal tract then finally to muscles, bones and joints. It becomes a true Digital Human invader. Now the body provides anti-bodies to neutralise this attack. Hopefully these successfully defeat the invader. Unfortunately the “flood” of these anti-bodies being called for by the immune system can become a problem itself. They have to have precise instructions on what to attack. If they get a set of incorrect instructions they can incorrectly identify normal human cells as being the enemy so destroying perfectly good living cells with this impacting the body’s ability to sustain life. Anti-bodies are called glycoproteins and they are a complex subject in their own right.

Now it is well publicised that it is the spikes on the SARS-CoV-2 virus that are the tools whereby they force entry into the human cell. Now the question to be answered - Is this entry by a chemical or a mechanical process? Does the spike touch the cell with a chemical that results in the human cell wall dissolving so the virus can gain access into the cell? Or is the spike equipped at its end with the equivalent of a “beak” where by it can mechanically beck its way into the cell membrane to gain access. To make it more transmittable either the attack chemical has been made more potent or the mechanical beak has been redesigned to make it cut into the cell more effectively. These are evolutionary changes. The digital code within the virus must have changed to allow these changes to be implemented. But there is no intelligence within a virus to trigger this redesign. Does it just happen randomly? If random a change could be for the better or it could be worse. A random decision making it worse could lower transmission rates and the virus could then just die out. 

You sort of enter the discipline of game theory. When to innovate against when to remain unchanged. Innovation could improve success or lead to failure. Remaining unchanged would uphold the status quo. This is against a backdrop of anti-bodies choosing to make similar decisions with hopefully vaccines improving the odds for the success of anti-bodies. The intellectual issue remains. What triggers the decision by the virus to change and how is the process undertaken to establish the new DNA code to support the change. One line of thought could be a battle raging inside someone with Covid-19 with the virus fighting the anti-bodies whilst trying to gain access to a human cell. In this battle the Covid-19 virus by chance effects a change that allows it to succeed in battle. The virus RNA is modified to reflect this change. Then reproduction is based upon this these new RNA instructions. These new mutant versions then proceed to succeed in all future battles thereby becoming the new dominant virus whilst the old virus just dies away. This is life played out at its very basic lower level almost emulating the basics that lead to the very start of life.These basic processes are what we need to understand if we are tio fully define the Digital Human.   

From an Information Analysts perspective (rather than a biologists) it is going to be vital that a standardised global resource is established so we can effectively deal with future global pandemics as well as all other diseases effecting our lives. Just as the internet has established local and global standardised communication networks (5G,Wifi, IP,Bluetooth etc) and the world wide web (WWW) has established global standardised information processing (HTML,XML,CSS,JS etc) along with all the supporting digital file structures (eg PDF,JPEG, MPEG etc) to define what goes on in the silica. Then similarly bioinformatics have to go through a process of establishing in a similar way all the biological standards necessary covering the living part of our world. It will be a lot more complicated that our current Information Technologies (IT) based upon silica but it is these technologies we will be using to get started.

 

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

20 - 027 Covid-19 and Human Genes

 Reading the headline that “Genes Linked to the Worst Cases” in the Times on Saturday the 12th December 2020 was really no surprise to this Digital Human. Just like computer viruses are dependent upon the underlying source code they attack on your computer then it is no surprise that human viruses adopt a similar strategy when attacking the human body. Computer viruses look for weaknesses to find their way into your computer. Human viruses must adopt a similar strategy. But they also can cause different levels of increased havoc dependent on your genetic makeup which is your equivalent to your computers source code. Your genetic makeup is the luck of the draw with it being established at the time of your conception. You are on then established on the roulette wheel of life. So what has been established so far in respect of Covid-19?

Scientists have identified mutations in five genes as having links to the disease becoming a life threatening illness for patients. The article goes on to say the Roslin Institute, Edinburgh University compared the genes of 2,244 critically ill British coronavirus patients with those of healthy volunteers. Variations in five genes – IFNAR2, TYK2, OASI, DPP9 and CCR2 – were associated with severe Covid-19 complications. These genes point to the importance of using antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments to lower the illness experienced in these patients. In terms of risk of death they are not significant factors, but still worth addressing, with age and the underlying health of the patient still remaining the key risk of death determinates.

Consider these genes in detail.

For IFNAR2 look at :-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IFNAR2

For TYK2 look at :-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/tyrosine_kinase_2

For OAS1 look at :-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAS1

For DPP9 look at :-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPP9

For CCR2 look at :-


If nothing else reading through these will introduce to the complexity of the genes of the Digital Human. In fact the Covid-19 virus is very simple compared with the complexity of the human body and the human cells it enters. Now if you just consider that it can all be defined in digital code then broken down to this basic level it can be easily analysed. The genes are small blocks of digital code. Genes link to genes like having hyperlinks. A virus entering the body is a piece of code that will establish its own links whilst the body will react by using anti-bodies to break these links. It can all be logically and digitally defined. Remember the work of Edward O. Wilson on Consilience. It is digitisation that is going to fully validate the concept of consilience.

20 - 026 - Protein Folding and Deep Mind

 The possibility of creating a the Digital Human just got very much closer with the DeepMind artificial intelligence research organisation, owned by Google, managing to digitise the protein folding process. So what does this all mean?

The human body is made of real tangible things. At an organ level (eg heart, liver, brain etc) these are easily visualised and you have probably seen the equivalents in animals at the local butcher. Now imagining zooming into these using an electron microscope which has the power to make a human hair look a mile wide. You going to come across structures made up from atoms and molecules so tiny they could never be handled by us as humans but they exist in the same way that organs exist but they are just a whole lot smaller.

These are the components that make up your human body. All be it very small components. They can be viewed under an electron microscope at the lowest level as tiny spheres, tubes and random three dimensional shapes that wriggle and move around. Importantly they have structures so they maybe strips that are straight or folded or tubes that are straight or bent or blobs that are any shape. They can float independently or have differing attachments to each other. They make up a very random and surreal world and to say it is abstract would be an understatement. Now to represent this real moving world of the body digitally has become the objective of DeepMind. It’s a case of getting what you can view under an electron microscope to be created digitally. Just like digital games reflect real life situations then DeepMind maps digitally represent the working of these really tiny biological components.

You are going to zoom down from human body to a human organ to cluster of human cells to a human cell and then to the molecules and atoms within this cell. Then no doubt in the future into the atom itself. It is the clusters of human cells forming their own unique structures where many new facets of life are to be uncovered. Being real physical structures the way they move and interact within the body can be investigated. Even using Computer Aided Manufacture (CAM) vastly enlarged models can be made of these structures. These can be handled and the way they lock together with other cell structures can be assimilated to learn how things work. By applying the same techniques to humans suffering illness and disease the faulty structures can be examined to determine how the condition is causing illness. But possibly most significantly the same processes can be applied after the introduction of medical interventions (eg drugs) to determine how they change these structures. Dismantling the human body, all be it digitally, like you would dismantle a car to locate the component that is the root cause of a medical problem. Digitisation is the key to this approach.

So let us try and visualise how this digitisation is achieved. There are similarities to computer gaming and computer aided design (CAD). So think of large rectangular box that the human body can be placed inside possibly lying down flat like being in a coffin but not coffin shaped being just rectangular box shaped. Now visualise ruler markings along the edges of this rectangular box. Using three of these edges with their marking points can allow you to locate any point within this box. So the tip of your nose can have an X reading and a Y reading and a depth from the top of the box being the Z reading. The classic three co-ordinates necessary to locate anything in space. Now image the ruler markings going down to the thousandth of a hair width so you can locate a point to a very exact molecular and even lower atomic level. You can define a living cell at the end of your nose. A large number of co-ordinates can define the shape of this cell as each point on the surface of the cell are defined by X-Y-Z co-ordinates. You can even define things within the cell itself along with their location and shape. The outer cell membrane can be defined by both its inner and outer surfaces thereby defining its thickness or even variations in this thickness over its surface. Now you can zoom both in and out. Out from a cell to the part of an organ, then the organ itself and then the organs place within the human body. It is Google Maps for the human body. This covers what I term the physical mapping. Now at every one of these points the chemical makeup of the point can be defined based upon the Periodic Table so you achieve chemical mapping. This allows you to create a chemical map if you like layered over the physical like in Google maps viewing something as a map or a satellite image. The same thing viewed in a physical and a chemical dimension. This creates the fact that within the physical shape the chemical makeup may adopt a different pattern. Seeing the human body in this layered way makes investigating the body’s changes and processes a multi-dimensional experience. The physical shape might change whilst the chemical makeup does not. Whilst the chemical makeup maybe changing whilst the physical remains unchanged. One of the commonest processes, a process representing change, would be for the chemical makeup within a cell to change with this subsequently resulting in a physical change. The key medically would be to spot theses chemical changes early with possibly a drug intervention before the problem presents itself as a physical change. True preventative medicine. It is important to reiterate the fact that the physical structures are created as a digital map and the chemical makeup is recorded as a separate digital map. These are then overlaid over each other. Now this overlaying of different what I have termed dimensions is important. The physical dimension and the chemical dimension. This lends itself to the addition of other dimensions if they can be scientifically be defined by capturing data on them. So for example the electrical activity within the body or other dimensions not previously scientifically identified. These maybe considered unreal at present but subjects like radiesthesia and telepathy come to mind being what I and others (but only a few of us) term the “wireless aspects of life”. Subjects to be explored later in this book.

But what becomes really important is when you can run these digital maps over time so you can view all the changes in the human body both physically and chemically. You can watch tumours grow and drugs destroy them digitally. This leads to the important ability to re-run scenarios over and over again with this forming one of the important tenets of artificial intelligence (AI). The ability to build up digital pathways that can represent reality. Adjustments can be made to data along these pathways and the changes can be recorded. This approach can then be used to build up a whole holistic view as thousands of different pathways are simulated and stored. So intelligence on a subject is grown until it shown to accurately represent a reality.

So what you can see under a digital microscope can now be digitally represented with the human body emulating a moving computer game. These are digital 3D shapes all interacting like they would within a real living biological body. In fact what you get to see digitally is a visual representation of what you would see under a powerful digital microscope. The significance of it being digital is that it can be analysed in terms of its internal structures then by using artificial intelligence processing different scenarios can be run through thousands of times with various adjustments being made to the objects under scrutiny. Essentially you can make changes, possibly by applying a drug, into the equation and then run through a sequence to determine the impact of the drug. Like playing strategy games where decision tree style thinking is important where at each node new decisions can be made about the way forward based upon new data. These biological digital models allowing for many thousands if not millions of different scenarios to be tested leading to different final results. Once a positive result is achieved you can reverse back over the decision tree to analyse all the different node point inputs.

Whilst being really comfortable with these digital models essentially replicating what can be seen using a digital microscope it is when it comes to the underlying chemistry of the model where this adds a new very powerful scientific dimension. Think of hovering a pointer over a particular point within the digital model and then the chemical makeup is displayed at a molecular level. Essentially the elements as defined in the Periodic Table. These can be painted as colours within the digital model so you can visually see the chemical makeup and importantly changes to this make up over time. You can see things going wrong both visually and chemically at the same time. A new tumour developing with cell multiplication with these cells changing in their chemical makeup. Then hopefully the reverse effect after the application of treatments. The thought that one day you could see all this happening in your body real time on your smartphone. Possibly the most significant aspect being the very early identification of these changes so they can be treated well before the patient is aware of any symptoms.

DeepMind is applying both Gaming and Computer Aided Design (CAD) principles to biological components down at a nanometre sizes. The CAD is important because it is simple step to Computer Aided Manufacture (CAM) where the three dimensional printing of components has become a standardised industrial practice. So it is a simple step to create physical three dimensional models of these biological components. Now significantly there is a school of thought that being able to create physical models of these tiny biological components will give us a totally new insight into how our bodies are assembled from the very smallest building blocks of atoms and molecules up to cells and cellular structures up to organs. So this is true biological engineering. The creation of these tiny cells, viruses and bacterium as real models produced through Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) but in sizes where they can be handled which allow us to see how they interact manually. The way viruses gain entry into human cells can be witnessed through the workings of these enlarged models. It is important to appreciate that although many of the processes within a human body are chemical it is also the mechanical designs that evolve from these chemical processes that undertake purely mechanical activities. They are interlocking mechanical processes like keys opening a lock or pick axes breaking into the wall of a cell. These are real mechanical activities taking place within the human body and their assessment as such it important as a tenet of medical investigation.

 

So why is this suddenly so significant in respect of the work at DeepMind on proteins?

Life is dependent on proteins. Proteins are made up from chains of organic compounds known as amino acids. These bond together into long chains to make proteins, which in turn create different types of tissue that perform all sorts of functions within the human body. Proteins, the building blocks of life, adopt complex three-dimensional shapes which determine what they do and how they do it. They make up good cells, bad cancer cells, viruses, bacteria and antibodies. If something is alive it will be made up of proteins. Proteins are the machinery of both life and unfortunately death. Failures in the production of these proteins will lead to death. Proteins which are collections of compounds called amino acids are the machinery of life. Machinery is the right term to use because it implies they are physical, which they are, so we need to know what they look like. They cannot just be considered as a chemical compound listing the molecules that make them up since life is about movement and this is the machinery that supports this movement. It is about biological engineering and not pure chemical engineering. At the atomic level biology works by the interlocking structures of atoms in a physical way. We need to know how the one dimensional sequence of atoms we get from chemistry “folds” in a 3D image. Into a real physical component.

Protein molecules can coil around themselves in all sorts of different ways. They can be tangled in a normal way. But also they can be tangled in a way that is abnormal leading to conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Tangling is a really strong force in natural for good and for bad. I think of how the Christmas tree lights or power cables to electrical appliances or water hoses or blind cords can get so horrendously tangled together. There seems to be some natural forces of nature that sit behind the tangling of rope or strip like materials particularly if they have protrusions like the lights on Christmas tree lights. Going back to the primeval soups of life it is these tangling processes that allowed the build-up of more complex life forms. Algae deposits and damp algae twisting and turning until by chance something more sophisticated is created. The complexity of sperm swimming to the egg to penetrate it to generate the start of a cell reproduction cycle. These basic building blocks of life need to be digitally analysed both physically and chemically to understand when and how life itself sparks into a continuous process of growth and decay. In the case of decay protein malformation and malfunction maybe behind many of the unpleasant conditions associated with the aging process.

 

 

Now deriving the chemical formula of a protein is scientifically relatively straightforward but determining its physical appearance was a long laborious process called crystallography. Prior to this digital break by DeepMind this was the standard way of “seeing” a protein by a process of crystallisation. That is lock it in a stasis in a repeating pattern then you fire x-rays at it in all different directions and from the image they form you can infer its shape. What DeepMind did was create some specific chemical knowledge and then apply this to those proteins where x-ray images existed from the above crystallography process. By constantly adjusting the underlying algorithm they started to get the protein chemical makeup to equal the created x-ray images. So the model was built upon crystallised protein x-ray pictures. So having trained the algorithm to link the protein amino acid structure to the corresponding specific crystallographic image it could then be applied to tens of thousands of proteins that had never been mapped using crystallography. Some of these previously unmapped proteins could then have the crystallographic process applied and this could be compared to the DeepMind image. The success rate of this DeepMind mapped image against the actual crystallographic image showed that the process was a real success. But importantly the algorithm could continue to be adjusted as new crystallographic images became available further refining its accuracy. To the point that the digital only processes were deemed as accurate as crystallography. But the digital approach had another major advantage.

Now in the body proteins are not crystallised but they are free moving structures that warp and bend continually. This makes the modelling of this real world behaviour a lot more difficult. But real success will follow on from when the digital modelling mirrors real life. The computer model equals what you can see under an electron microscope. But then significantly digital model will have captured the underlying logic to these biological processes. Once this structure is a “calculated” one based upon this logic we can then run in a “live” model emulating life within the human body. Knowing this we can go onto design the experiments that make drugs and enzymes and all the molecular tools we need to improve the human condition. These medical interventions can also be modelled real time so we can monitor how they interact with the faulty proteins. So create a sick digital human then test the best medical interventions to make it better.

 

Monday, November 16, 2020

20 - 025 HeLa an immortal cell line.

 In 1965 HeLa cells were used to create the first human-animal hybrid by fusing HeLa cells with mouse embryo cells allowing for the mapping of genes in specific chromosomes that lead eventually to the Human Genome Project and thus the definition of the Digital Human.

The HeLa is named after the first two letters of the patients first and last names so in this case Henrietta Lacks lead to the naming of this immortal cell line. More about Henrietta Lacks later.  

The HeLa cell line is the oldest and most commonly used immortalised human cell line. These cells that have been kept alive and allowed to reproduce over many years and will continue indefinitely to reproduce into the future provided they are looked after by research laboratories. These are cells kept “in vitro” meaning in glass colloquially called “test tube experiments”. Although it can make use of a variety of laboratory equipment to store them in ranging from test tubes, flasks, vats, petri dishes and microtiter plates. Components of a living organism are isolated from their normal biological surroundings. These can be microorganisms, cells or biological molecules.

This leads to a branch of biological science informally known as omics where the suffix – omics is added to the end to form genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, foodomics, transcriptomics and glycomics. The suffix ome is used to address the objects of study of such fields such as genome, proteome and metabolome. The “ome” indicating the whole thing. Bioinformaticians and molecular biologists focus upon the objects ending in “ome”.

The significant thing was the HeLa cell was digitally mapped so its precise structure could be viewed like you would view computer code. It was a particularly aggressive cancer cell having a very fast rate of reproduction. The cancer is triggered by the human papillomavirus virus which causes a cell to mutate to become cancerous. Now Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines have been developed and are used preventing 70% of these cervical cancers taking hold.

This blog is not looking at this scientific detail today but at the source of the HeLa Immortal Cell Line. It was an African-American woman called Henrietta Lacks (1920-1951) whose cells from a cervical cancer tumour biopsied by the John Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, USA that started this cell line. Unfortunately the cancer was to cause her death in 1951.

Read the detail about Henrietta Lacks at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta Lacks

Now this whole subject had a very low media profile until in 2000 the author Rebecca Skloot documented extensive histories of both the HeLa cell line and the Lacks family. This was then followed in 2010 by the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” and then a film based upon the book in 2017.

Read up more detail at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca Skloot using the links within this post to investigate further.

So after 69 years the cells in Henrietta Lacks cervical cancer tumour are still living and reproducing in research labs across the world. In fact it has been recently used in the search for the coronavirus vaccine.

 

Sunday, November 15, 2020

20 - 024 First Coronavirus Vaccine

 Whilst I am not a Donald Trump enthusiast he did have a sharp decisive, if slightly random mind, on some subjects and a very cut down basic use of language. So in his much ridiculed speech announcing there would soon be a disinfectant to kill the virus it turns out this was not too far from the truth. With the dictionary definition that a disinfectant is a substance that destroys harmful germs Trump probably for those not wanting any more detail got it exactly right. In fact the likely first approved coronavirus vaccine is a bit like a disinfectant in that it does essentially a teaching job by teaching the human defence systems how to spot and kill these coronaviruses. So our defence system becomes the true disinfectant doing the killing job but only after the vaccine has acted as a safe decoy allowing our own defence systems to get some training and practice in place on locating it and destroying it.

So Uger Sahin and Ozlem Tureci, the German- Turkish couple, working at their Biontech Biotechnology Laboratory in Germany partnered with the American pharmaceutical company Pfizer to develop their cancer cell killing coding techniques across into the realm of destroying viruses. This approach in terms of virus vaccine creation is revolutionary. I believe one other vaccine is adopting a similar approach with many of the others dependant on mutants of existing biological cells which is the normal vaccine creation approach. The so called monkey cells being on a similar branch of the Darwin Evolutionary Tree of Life to ourselves.

So the vaccine is a set of synthetically created genetic instructions telling cells to make viral proteins that prime the immune system to go into attack and destroy mode. This is called the mRNA vaccine type which are made from synthetically created nanoparticles. The approach is similar to the genetically synthesised products now used to treat diabetic patients. Your system gets a dose of this “coronavirus” look alike which causes your immune to prepare the defences to deal with it. When a real coronavirus arrives it is ready prepared and quickly goes into attack mode. Using the term “look alike” suggests some sort of visual identification and unfortunately with all the media showing the coronavirus looking like a sphere with with spikes attached (which it does under an electron microscope) you can start to think incorrectly. Remember everything is based upon chemical chains, think (Chemical Period Table), which can be digitally represented. So the chemical chain of the new coronavirus vaccine is similar to the chemical chain of the real biological coronavirus. Obviously the vaccine is not living but the cells in the immune system that attack it are living. Once “pre-programmed” it is these living cells that will go onto to kill the real coronavirus. It is the chemical make up of the spikes that is providing the ideal "target" for the immune system anti-bodies to identify it as an intruder cell. So the focus of the vaccine is to have this chemical make up within it and then success is dependant on the degree to which it is identical to the chemical makeup of a real coronavirus spike. 

 The treatment of diabetes is now dependant on techniques similar to that being applied to the new coronavirus vaccine to produce synthetic insulin. The original insulin was harvested from pigs and cattle which had the high potential to be infected and thus a risk to the patient. It is now created from a human gene for insulin synthesis and cutting and pasting this into the generic code of the E coli bacterium. This genetically modified bacteria is then grown in vat’s and the insulin harvested off them. So digitally change the recipe and then grow the insulin. So initially the crude techniques that were used to create Genetically Modified (GM) wheat and rice (so called golden rice) have now been upgraded to operate on the Digital Human re-programming our immune system to spot and kill the coronavirus.

So Donald Trump calling it a disinfectant was probably not too far off the mark.

Saturday, October 31, 2020

20 - 023 Sonic Hedgehog Protein

 No you have not suddenly come across a gaming blog post nor have I as the author of this post lost the plot. Believe it or not it is one of the processes that occurs in what has been termed the hedgehog signalling pathway. The Hedgehog signalling pathway is a signalling pathway that transmits information to embryonic cells in support of cell differentiation. The cell signalling pathway is the communication between cells. The importance of the term signal is that it is potentially digital information. It’s a message transmitted from one cell to another. This message is generated by a Biological Programming Language. So let us first make it clear that this is a real chemical mixture which has been defined by the SHH gene. Just to complicate matters there is the Desert Hedgehog protein defined by the DHH gene and the Indian Hedgehog protein defined by the IHH gene that also exist within the hedgehog signalling pathway.

Firstly these were not derived from studying hedgehogs but flies. But because the larvae used in the experimentation looked like a hedgehog it acquired this name. So let us look briefly at the Sonic Hedgehog Protein.

The Sonic Hedgehog Protein is called a morphogen. Now the author as an Information Technologist gets really excited by the fact that Alan Turing in his paper “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis” predicted a chemical mechanism for biological pattern formation decades before research showed this to be a real physical biological process. To the author the building up of the embryo from a single cell and the ongoing maintenance of the human body had to have some design plans. How else would you know to put five fingers on the end of the palm within the design of a hand. Or an ear on each side of the face. Being a cell at the end of a palm how do I know the next cell will be part of a finger and not another bit of palm. Somehow these patterns have to be stored and progress in the making of these patterns recorded so you know how far you have got in the construction process. So I am the last palm cell now make a finger cell. This applies to the bone structure, artery structure, muscle structure and the skin wrapped over them. There must be coordination between them to build things in the right sequence. Sequence is indicative of a time element with this step having to be completed before that the next step. So the bone creation step by step. Then possibly around it the muscle creation step by step. This interwoven with the laying down of the blood pipework (arteries) outgoing and the return pipework with these inclusive of their own pumping muscles. Finally for this to be wrapped with a layer of skin.

This as a subject goes beyond the realms of just analysing the chemical make up of a human body. It moves us into the process of how the human body is made and then maintained. 

References

Read up on Sonic Hedgehog

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_hedgehog

Read up on Desert Hedgehog

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_hedgehog_(protein)

Read up on Indian Hedgehog

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_hedgehog_(protein)

Read up on the Hedgehog signaling pathway

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedgehog_signalling_pathway


Read up on the Cell signaling

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_signaling

Read up on Morhogen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphogen

Read up on the Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chemical_Basis_of_Morphogenesis

 

 

Thursday, October 29, 2020

20 - 022 Biological Programming Language

 

So here I sit with all my biological components made up of cells put together to make me a Digital Human. Each of these components can be defined in terms of their cells and chemically analysed. Each of these chemicals making up a cell can be digitally defined. Cells are continually being reproduced (or not in some cases) so a defined process has to from within a cell decide to make a new copy with all the instructions for doing so included. This instructions are called a transcription process. These instructions can go wrong so we have cancerous cell reproduction. The transcription instructions have to be digitally defined (or possibly something similar to digital) to create a Biological Programming Language.

Now if we consider that this Biological Programming Language exists in the stem cells where the stem cell is the outstanding source of all these instructions. From this one cell type embryos grow every other cell type from muscles to neurons. Each cell type being made up of a different digital gene code structures designed to achieve the specific purpose of the cell type.

So if you gain control over this Biological Programming Language you have the capability to control cell reproduction through a transcription mechanism. So you can reprogram stem cells to make any human cell required. But doing so is not that straightforward because they have not got all the genes in the newly created cell work properly. So the current version of this Biological Programming Language is not fully controlling these transcription processes. Although it would seem that a new company called Bit.Bio may have developed some further technology that solves this problem.

Read the article below in the Times on the 271020 :-



Then go look at the www.bit.bio website for more information.

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

20 - 021 3D Manufacturing Process leading to Digital Treatments

 

So in nanometer (nm) terms we want to discuss here something very large but it can still potentially float down the inside of a human hair. It is a tug boat, yes because it has been made to look like a tug boat, which measures 0.03 mm long. That is 30,000 nm so it is enormous compared with the things we normally view at an atomic scale like viruses or a helium atom at 0.06 nm.

What is really significant was it was created using 3D printing. So it was manufactured. Significantly it has been designed to propel itself along using a chemical reaction.

The Times article (281020) by Tom Knowles describes the detail below.



 This article does not focus upon what I see as the real significance of the boat, which is not so much the size because this has been achieved before by many research laboratories, but the fact that it is manufactured by a computer program. Not by the manual manipulation of tiny atoms but by a manufacturing process. The computer code defines this process linked to a 3D printer manufacturing machine. The computer code has been written to drive the 3D Printer to build the boat up in defined layers using an advanced 2PP (two-photon polymerisation) process utilising extremely accurate lasers. The other significant step is the inclusion in this process of a chemically driven “engine” to propel the boat along. Be it just a chemical reaction it is still generating power. It is not static and inert but a dynamic creation obviously like a battery with a finite life. This along with the tiny walking robots produced by Cornell University in America mark the trend towards developing “machines” that can operate within our bodies undertaking removal or repair work.

So not only will be defined fully as a “digital human” but all the processes to care for us will be defined as “digital treatments”. The tool kit is repair us will be written up in digital program code driving specialist devices to manufacture and install them. Although these devices would initially be hospital laboratory based it does not take much imagination it envisage home based devices with the code to drive them downloaded from the internet.

Friday, October 2, 2020

20 - 020 Making things smaller than Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

 Now with the latest advanced chips having digital switch sizes down to 5 nanometers (nm) you can appreciate how much progress has been made in the miniaturisation of electronics. It is worth on Wikipedia looking up the “International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors” or ITRS to see the progress on miniaturisation from 1971 getting down to 5 nm in 2020 for the size of these digital switches.

Use this link to see the Wikipedia page for ITRS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors

Now you realise these digital switches are now smaller than the Coronavirus 2 Virus which has a range between 60 nanometers (nm) to a maximum diameter of 140 nanometers (nm). Whilst the length of the spikes that surround the coronavirus sphere can vary from 9 to 12 nm. So we are now able to successfully manufacture something smaller that the virus. But in both cases it is very difficult to comprehend how small both these switches and the virus are in the real world. Now both of these can be viewed using electron microscopes along with many other small pieces of matter. This is called science undertaken at a nanoscale level. The exciting aspect to viewing the world at a nanoscale level is everything in our world starts to look exactly the same. So both inorganic and organic (life supporting) structures start to look identical. At the nanoscale level we move down to seeing the smallest building blocks of our world. Importantly to this author it will start to unify all the separate sciences under the one heading of Nanosciece and its application through Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is focussed upon using real things that measure between 1 to 100 nanometers. Without a doubt it will be information technology that proves the most effective technology for the unification of the other sciences which has evolved its own name as Nano Convergence. But before we consider this unification or convergence it is important to get an appreciation of the size of a nanometre.

A nanometer is a unit of length equal to one billionth of a meter. (0.000 000 001 m) and is used to express dimensions on an atomic scale. For example a helium atom is 0.06 nm which is a reminder that you can have many things that are even smaller than a nanometer. Now everybody appreciates a nanometer is very small but it is difficult for us to picture exactly how small. To give you some perception note a coin like a penny is roughly 1 millimeter thick so imagine you could shrink yourself down to being just 1 nanometer tall then that 1 millimeter coin sat alongside you would look like it was a 100 miles tall.

Now in the organic or living world the DNA in the cells of our bodies is between 2 to 3 nanometers thick but up to several millimetres long so it has the proportions of a long piece of fine thread curled up inside the chromosomes. Atoms and water molecules are smaller than a nanometer. Whilst the wavelength of visible light ranges from approximately 400 nanometers at the violet end of the spectrum to approximately 700 nanometers at the red end.

So in terms of the size of what we can manufacture we are not far off being able to make digital life but establishing the digital patterns that can generate the chemical patterns to make us humans it is going to require far more complex digital processing. This is where the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) processing techniques is going to accelerate our progress.


For a  more detailed analysis of SARS-CoV-2 read this excellent PDF

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MoJ4T32z3ZLPDEQDawxzUf3A43ZWXfBbrCTv_HvaKqo/edit?usp=sharing


Friday, May 15, 2020

20 - 019 Has the Human on a Smartphone got nearer?


The idea that a human could be fully defined digitally on a Smartphone, the thesis of the Digital Human Book, just got a little nearer. But only a little.

NVIDIA an American advanced chip designer previously focussed upon graphics processing chips and now entering the artificial intelligence marketplace has released their DGX A100 AI chip containing 54 billion transistors with a 5 petaflops performance. They are in the same marketplace as the other major chip designers and manufacturers Intel, AMD, Qualcomm and ARM.

It uses their Ampere architecture which is a single micro architecture for its Graphics Processing Unit’s (GPU) supporting both commercial AI and consumer graphics usage. Their specialist capabilities in support of graphics processing have now been applied to the broader capabilities required by artificial intelligence (AI) processing. At the end of the day it is all about the processing of on-off switches be they used for graphics or AI.

The DGX A100 is a 7 nanometer chip produced to this higher concentration of transistors but still on a 2D wafer. Significantly the current Apple A12 chip fitted to the iPhone XS, XS Max and XR and the 2019 iPad Air and 5th Generation iPad Mini is also a 7 nanometer chip produced by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) for Apple in Taiwan. But this only has 6.9 billion transistors. But it does show how near to the leading edge chip technologies your smartphone is getting in terms of its capabilities. When applied to a Smartphone these can be in your pocket now.

But to emulate a Digital Human on a Smartphone we are still probably a factor of several 1000’s if not millions off the processing power that will be needed. But it does show how amazing the biological human is in terms of sheer digital processing power. Unless how we humans actually do it takes us beyond digital (just on-off) into another dimension. Certainly we are also not limited to a 2D wafer like current chips with our storage running to three dimensions (3D) as per the brain. But our digital world is progressing although no doubt in 50 year’s time (2070) we will look back amazed at how crude our digital technologies were in 2020. We will be asking what’s a chip? What’s a Smartphone?

20 - 018 Something different - Consilience


Today we need to leave the biological sciences to zoom upwards and take a much higher perspective. Or oddly enough in this case zoom down to a much lower perspective. All will be revealed.

The book title A Digital Human already eludes to this way of thinking. It looks at the biological human as a digital device. In fact consilience means a unity of knowledge. In truth this is an old word that has gone out of fashion in the 21st Century belonging more to the 19th Century when the sciences were racing ahead establishing their credibility. But it turns out that the book A Digital Human is really about consilience. Maybe a more relevant term maybe consolidation. It is the consolidation of everything to the digital foundation. Put simply the consolidation of everything to the on- off switches that are the building blocks of all things electronic. So why the shift towards the digital?



It is necessary for me as the author of this book, currently a work in progress, to stop and remind myself of the book’s objectives. To me the clear objective of a book is to take you as the reader and lead you through a number mental change processes so by the end of the book you think differently on the subject covered. To do this here I want to briefly consider three authors who cemented in my mind the subject of consilience. They changed my thought processes let us see if they change yours.

Firstly Edward O. Wilson an American biologist born 1929. He published a book called “Consilience” (1998). He quotes from William Whewell in his 1840 synthesis “The Philosophy of Inductive Sciences” as the first to speak of consilience.

To quote:-

“The Consilience of Inductions takes place when an Induction, obtained from a class of facts, coincides with an Induction, obtained from another different class. This Consilience is a test of the truth of the Theory in which it occurs.” Replace the word “induction” with “experiment” to appreciate a 21st Century interpretation.

Then to quote from Wilson’s book:-

“Disciplinary boundaries within the natural sciences are disappearing, to be replaced by shifting hybrid domains in which consilience is implicit. These domains reach across many levels of complexity, from chemical physics and physical chemistry to molecular genetics, chemical ecology and ecological genetics.”

Secondly Bruce F.Katz with his book “Neuroengineering The Future” (2008) in which he quotes William of Occam in the 11th Century where “entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity”. He also quotes Einstein’s famous dictum that a theory should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.

Then to quote fromKatz’s book:-

“…the simpler the theory, the greater its ability to generalise to new phenomena. Complex theories arise because they tend to have many special cases, each encompassing a disparate set of results. Each aspect of the theory covers one and only one such set. However, if a commonality can be found that ranges over these results, it will often be the case that it also explains as yet unseen empirical data.”

This is where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is going to be able to take us once everything is successfully transformed into their digital foundations.

Thirdly William Sims Bainbridge with his book “Nanoconvergence” (2007) brings it all together with the quote in the book taken from his 2000 report “Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology” edited by Mike Roco and himself :-

“A revolution is occurring in science and technology, based on the recently developed ability to measure, manipulate and organise matter on a nanoscale – 1 to 100 billionths of a meter. At the nanoscale, physics, chemistry, biology, materials science and engineering converge toward the same principles and tools. As a result progress in nanoscience will have a very far reaching impact.”

Followed by a more comprehensive statement in a 2003 Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance Report:-

“We stand at the threshold of a new renaissance in science and technology, based on a comprehensive understanding of the structure and behaviour of matter from the nanoscale up to the most complex system yet discovered, the human brain. Unification of science based unity in nature and its holistic investigation will lead to technological convergence and a more efficient societal structure for reaching human goals. In the early decades of the twenty-first century, concentrated effort can bring together nano-technology, biotechnology, information technology and the new technologies based upon cognitive science. With proper attention to ethical issues and societal needs, the result can be a tremendous improvement in human abilities, new industries and products, societal outcomes, and quality of life.”

So as an author have I started to change your thinking processes towards everything moving towards a digitally based foundation where artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to seek out many of the unknowns spanning the different scientific disciplines? Will it all dissolve down to some simple rules as Einstein predicted. Or not?

Saturday, May 9, 2020

20 - 017 Human Gene Codes


As the armchair biologist reading all manner of resources on genetics you soon keep coming across codes like FMR1, CCR5 and FOXP2 referred to in many of the articles. What is going on? These are what I have termed Human Gene Codes. 

Well this is how all the genes within the human genome have been named individually. They are little bits of coherent code that define how something is finally made in your body. But just to set the context correctly these types of codes are also used for other genomes not just humans. They exist for mice, fruit flies and peas in fact for any living organism. Anything where DNA exists defining the master plan for making that organism. Mice, fruit flies and peas have been listed because, believe it or not, most of the early genetic research focussed on these three living things. Mainly because all three reproduced quickly best supporting this type of research that needed to be undertaken over many of the living thing generations.

Now just deviating slightly off from the subject of Gene Codes we need to just give ourselves an appreciation of how small everything is in the world of genetics. Watching an ant running around a paving slab in the hot sun measuring between 2-3 mm in length reminds you that stored within all his living cells is DNA that defines the building of the ant. In fact the ant has all the same capabilities as a human. Head, brain, nervous system, digestive system, legs, eyes and so forth. The majority of the DNA will be identical to that of a human except in the process of evolution the DNA went down the insect branch rather than the mammal branch so some differences will exist. So this should allow you to better visualise how big a gene is since in the ant and the human the actual gene is the same size.

So what about the documentation of genes that go across all species. This is a specialist area in bioinformatics called Gene Ontology (GO). So let us just confirm at bioinformatics is the interdisciplinary field that develops methods and software tools for understanding biological data. So bioinformatics is the study of the Digital Human in an informal way. Gene Ontology (GO) looks to maintain and develop a controlled vocabulary (the FMR letter codes) of genes and gene products attributes. Now just to complicate matters the Gene Ontology (GO) is part of a larger classification effort, the Open Biomedical Ontologies, being one of the initial Candidate Members of the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry. Currently there are more than hundred ontologies that follow the OBO Foundry principles. (http://obofoundry.org) .

Now do not get too confused by all these names of bodies looking to mark up biological data. Firstly the term ontology is not anything to do with biology. It is more to do with philosophy. It is about defining entities (ie things) that exist by giving them a name or label. The grouping of like things is part of the process then often establishing hierarchies of related things. So for the terms used say in banking or retailing or manufacturing or logistics you could create an ontology. Think of it being like an index or glossary. Now the fact biology is now getting around to drawing up ontologies is significant because it is a prerequisite to establishing data processing, information processing and artificial intelligence processing. It is getting the building blocks of data analysis in place. But with the biological sciences it is much more complex than anything in the commercial computing world.

So next time you see say “FOXP2” can I suggest you use the Genetics Home Reference site search to look it up at http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov . So try looking at FM03 which causes Trimethylaminuria the genic disorder that makes you smell like a fish. This site contains a huge list of these Gene Codes. So next time you read something and a code like “FREM2” comes up use this website to look up the details.

Friday, May 8, 2020

20 - 016 DNA - RNA - Proteins


It is very important that when you are trying to understand something that you first establish in your mind a simple model that you can then drill down from to more detailed lower level models. You can call these models, diagrams, frameworks or process flows. To support understanding the best ones are hierarchical because at the top level it is like a summary or precise which is then linked to lower models which serve to expand on the detail. The author is from a professional computer background where the design of computer systems has always been dependent on the use of such modelling or process design techniques. From the top level Enterprise Architectures (EA) down through to the Unified Modelling Language (UML) these are the established techniques for designing and building computer systems. Now being only an armchair biologist and chemist for me to understand these subjects I have to apply my digital methodologies to them. This is why it is called the Digital Human.

So being an armchair biologist and chemist I have a preference for locating models that have been created by experts within these professions that coincide with the types of model I would have been familiar with or created in my digital profession. So I have located just such a diagram below which is copyrighted to Nature Education (2014). 








So in this one diagram it at a high level establishes the process flow from DNA through RNA and to Protein creation. The protein is the living cell. It does not go into the detail of DNA transcription to RNA nor the Translation from RNA to the Proteins. At this stage we do not want any more detail or complexity (eg mRNA). We just want simplicity. So in simple terms the DNA which is like a roadmap is transcriped into a simpler linear sequences of RNA which become the recipes for making proteins by sequencing the amino acids within these proteins. It is important that you get this very simple model understood. We will enlarge on the detail as we drill down into this model later in the book.

Sunday, May 3, 2020

20 - 015 Is cononavirus like a computer virus?





Is coronavirus like a computer virus?

So is coronavirus like a computer virus? Well obviously not.  Coronavirus is obviously biological in that it consists of living bits of chemical called proteins. Whilst a computer virus  is a non-living object. Now the thesis of this Digital Human Book is that everything biological and living can be represented in digital code. Essentially thousands of bits (like light bulbs) that are either switched on or off in the computer’s memory. Now if you projected all these bits on to the side of a building you could see many different patterns in it. When these small patterns look the same you have within these masses of bits identified a common object. It could be the digital representation of your face used in face recognition. Or for coronavirus it would be the digital pattern that has been identified firstly in China and subsequently at many locations throughout the world. In fact all the current coronavirus testing takes the test swab and through a process called the “polymerase chain reaction test” detects the virus genetic information. Now the interesting challenge would be to reverse engineer the process where this genetic digital information could be generated back into a biological virus. From computer code back to a living thing. 












Friday, May 1, 2020

20 - 014 Coronavirus Networking and Data Sharing


What a changed world we now live in with the internet now supporting global networking and data sharing. It allows anyone to become involved in what would have previously been hidden areas of research. Coronavirus is the best example to date of the benefits that the internet offers in terms of instant internet networking and data sharing. The openness now applied to this type of “save the human race” research with the removal of all commercial and governmental secrecy (as far as I know) has allowed the ordinary individual to become party to these events in real time. Now it is accepted that what you get to read and research being “first hand” is often far too technical to understand. This in my opinion is a good thing since it is not always good for you to only read what the media have decided to simplify for your consumption. The simplification detracts from the complexity which allows social media pundits to draw very simplified conclusions and propose their own direction of travel without knowing the underlying detail.

So in the case of coronavirus what can we get access to that may have been previously kept away from the public view?


One of my popular websites on viruses is http://virological.org where I can gather around the coffee machine with the world’s virologists for a morning chat. Unfortunately like many a chat what I get to read one day maybe gone the next. Best to remember the internet has its own fluidity. Someone on the other end is always moving things around to confuse you. Always look to capture it on own your own digital hardware. I am not even a full convert to the Cloud Architecture. Remember they are businesses running them. Sorry for about the gripe. But it is a blog !!!. So moving on with the subject in hand.


So I got to see the original posting from edward_holmes as introduced below :-


“10th January 2020. This posting is communicated by Edward C. Holmes, University of Sydney on behalf of the consortium led by Professor Yong-Zhen, Fudan University, Shanghai.”

It opens with “The Shanghai Public Health Clinical & School of Public Health, in collaboration with the Central Hospital of Wuhan etc etc …………is releasing a coronavirus genome from a case of respiratory disease from the Wuhan outbreak. The sequence has also been deposited on GenBank (accession MN908947 20.2k) and will be released as soon as possible.”


So this was post by Professor Edward Holmes working at the University of Sydney. He is an expert on infectious diseases particularly RNA viruses that jump boundaries to infect humans. He can be located on http://scholar.google.com.au giving you a link to his paper published in 2020 “A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China” with excellent links to published articles based upon the paper.


Now the link on the post lead to go to http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov so then follow the path NCBI>DNA7RNA>Nucleotide Database where you can actually view the complete underlying genome code for “Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 complete genome”. 

This site is the National Centre for Biotechnology Information in the USA. Now GenBank is the NIH genetic sequence database of publicly available DNA sequences. GenBank is part of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration with Japan and Europe. These international centres process such data on a daily basis so it is real time research.



Now if you like searching through data that that means nothing to you this is the place to visit. Maybe it is my computer background but I enjoy just searching through data and the less I understand it the better. The internet now allows you to become involved in any subject and at any level of research. So today I am an amateur virologist. But what it does achieve is to make you aware of the complexity that the normal media looks to avoid in their published stories. In my case it always triggers me to want to learn more so once again the internet becomes invaluable. Just Google or Wikipedia every word you do not understand. Even buy a book or even if you are digitally dependant an eBook off Amazon. But alongside this information the key difference these days is you can have access to the first hand sources on the subject and in real time see how things are unfolding. In fact it pays to pick a few experts to follow where their bio and writings make you want to make them your new best research friend.


The big difference is with coronavirus as the current subject matter under the spotlight it is uncharted and things are unfolding in real time. This along with it being relevant to everyone, because anyone can catch it and die, makes it currently the ideal subject to have access to this inside information over the internet. Fortunately the scientists working on solving the problems are adopting currently a none commercial open systems approach freely sharing their information on open access websites. Within 12 days of the Chinese sharing the digital genome of coronavirus over the internet an American team had shared an analysis showing the mechanism by which the coronavirus entered human cells. Then within 12 hours scientists in China had shown there analysis was correct. The speed of data interchange about the virus was starting to match the speed at which the virus was spreading. But unfortunately developing the solutions would take a lot longer.