Up pops on my iPhone the NHS Seasonal Vaccination Invitation for a Spring 2024 COVID-19 Vaccination for over 75 year olds. So down to the Local Health Centre on Thursday 25th April for a quickly administered jab in the arm. Its my 7th COVID-19 jab since my first in February 2021.
All mine have been using the latest mRNA technology
and fortunately I have had no adverse side effects. This is obviously not true
for everybody with a few cases within my family members refusing to have any
more due to the adverse effects of having previous COVID-19 jabs. In my case I
am sure if I had a very bad experience after a jab I would choose not to put
myself through it again. Why self-inflict this on yourself? Or could it be just
a case of if you did catch COVID-19 then the way your body is reacting to the
jab may indicate if you did catch it you could be at high risk of it killing
you. Or is it just your body badly reacting to the injected man-made chemical concoction
emulating the same physical appearance attributes of COVID-19?. Unlike COVID-19
this chemical concoction is dead and not a living entity. It is just there to
help your immune system to learn how to spot it. The immune system remembers
how it looks and so when a real COVID-19 virus turns up it more quickly kills
it. The immune system maintains a huge memory list of things it needs to
attack. Unfortunately sometimes this immune system memory gets mistaken and
attacks parts of your own body thinking they are the attackers. This causes the
auto-immune diseases where you body sets out destroying itself.
This is why immunisation remains a still
undefinable and so indeterminate medical treatment. You cannot accurately
predict for each person how the body will react to a newly introduced chemical
concoction. The outcomes can only really be defined in a statistical manner and
if you are unfortunate enough to become one of the statistical failures there
is nothing you can do about it. In my way of thinking the fact that this
injected concoction now is structured very near to the fundamental mRNA that is
our fundamental biological recipe for building real biological cells makes it
as near to the right tool to do the job of protecting me from the living virus.
One mistake made by the public is to think that
immunisation is a modern medical approach. In fact in 1721 a deadly smallpox
epidemic broke out in London and in Boston, Massachusetts, America. There was a
debate at the time about the technique of inoculation that started in Turkey
where the pus from festering victims was forced into the tissues of healthy
people. It was proved that it protected these healthy people from the disease.
Inevitably, not unlike these days, there were believers and non-believers in
this approach. In fact as an approach it emulates exactly how the body builds
up immunity from birth where both viruses and bacteria entering the body are
dealt with by the immune system developing to kill them. In fact encouraging
the mixing of children with symptoms with those without was considered by many
an effective way of building up this immune system protection. But inoculation
is different to immunisation.
So let us use some AI to describe the difference
between inoculation and immunisation.
So ChatGPT says:-
Inoculation
and immunisation are related but slightly different terms. Inoculation
typically refers to the introduction of a small amount of a pathogen into the
body to trigger an immune response, often used historically before vaccines
were developed. Immunisation, on the other hand, involves the administration of
a vaccine to stimulate the immune system to develop immunity against specific
diseases. So, while both aim to protect against disease, inoculation is an
older term often associated with deliberate exposure, while immunisation
involves the use of vaccines.
No comments:
Post a Comment