This is a deep and important question, because it probes where “code” ends and raw physics begins in living systems. The short answer is: very little of human biology is free of codification, but some aspects are dominated by chemistry rather than symbolic interpretation. Below I’ll be careful to separate pure chemical necessity from interpreted biological code.
First: what “purely chemical” means here
By not dependent on codification, we mean processes that:
• Do not require symbolic mapping (like codon → amino acid)
• Do not depend on context-dependent interpretation
• Follow directly from physical chemistry laws
• Would behave the same in a test tube without biological “readers”
Aspects of human biology that are largely non-codified
1. Basic Thermodynamics & Diffusion
These are unavoidable physical processes:
• Diffusion of gases (O₂, CO₂)
• Heat dissipation
• Osmosis driven by concentration gradients
• Brownian motion inside cells
They happen because molecules move, not because they mean anything.
A red blood cell doesn’t “interpret” oxygen—it binds it because chemistry favors it.
2. Acid–Base Chemistry (pH buffering)
Examples:
• Carbonic acid–bicarbonate buffering in blood
• Proton gradients forming naturally across membranes
These rely on:
• Equilibrium constants
• Charge interactions
• Proton affinity
No symbolic mapping is involved—only chemical inevitability.
3. Enzyme Catalysis at the Reaction Level
While which enzymes exist is coded, how enzymes work is chemistry.
• Lock-and-key / induced-fit interactions
• Transition-state stabilization
• Hydrogen bonding and electrostatics
Once an enzyme exists, the reaction rate increase is a direct physical consequence.
4. Lipid Bilayer Self-Assembly
Cell membranes form because:
• Amphipathic molecules minimize free energy
• Hydrophobic effect forces bilayer formation
This happens spontaneously, without instruction.
Soap bubbles and cell membranes obey the same chemistry.
5. Protein–Ligand Binding (in isolation)
Binding often depends on:
• Shape complementarity
• Van der Waals forces
• Electrostatic attraction
The binding itself is chemical inevitability, even though biology later uses it as a signal.
6. Mechanical Properties of Tissues
Examples:
• Bone rigidity from mineralization
• Tendon elasticity from collagen
• Blood viscosity
These are emergent material properties, not codes.
7. Electrical Properties of Ions
At base level:
• Sodium and potassium move according to electrochemical gradients
• Ion channels conduct based on pore structure
The physics of charge flow is non-symbolic, even though neurons use it symbolically at higher levels.
Where chemistry ends and codification begins
The crucial boundary is interpretation.
Process Chemistry Codification
Oxygen binding hemoglobin ✅ ❌
Hormone binding receptor ✅ ⚠️ (context-dependent meaning)
Neurotransmitter release ⚠️ ✅
DNA transcription ❌ ✅
Neural firing pattern meaning “fear” ❌ ✅
A key insight
Chemistry provides constraints; codification provides choice.
Pure chemistry:
• Has no memory
• Has no representation
• Has no alternatives
Codified biology:
• Stores past information
• Selects among possible actions
• Maps one domain (signals) onto another (responses)
Final synthesis
Human biology rests on a chemical substrate, but:
• Chemistry alone cannot specify form
• Chemistry alone cannot specify function
• Chemistry alone cannot specify meaning
Thus:
• Chemistry is necessary
• Codification is what makes life biological rather than just reactive matter
If you want, we can push this further:
• Is codification reducible to chemistry?
• Are biological codes “real” or observer-imposed?
• Where exactly consciousness sits on this spectrum
• Whether artificial systems could have non-chemical codification
Just say where you’d like to go.
No comments:
Post a Comment