Explaining consciousness in terms of codification is one of the cleanest ways to talk about it without mysticism or reductionism. I’ll build this step-by-step, keeping it grounded in what we’ve already established.
1. The core claim
Consciousness is a special kind of biological codification:
a self-referential, value-weighted, temporally integrated code.
It is not just neural activity, and not just information — it is information organized as meaning for a system itself.
2. What kind of code consciousness is not
Before defining it, we should exclude some common confusions.
Consciousness is not:
• A raw sensory signal
• A single neural firing or pattern
• A passive readout
• A mere data store
Those are components, not the phenomenon.
3. Levels of codification leading up to consciousness
Think in layers:
Level 1: Sensory coding
• Photons → retinal signals
• Sound waves → cochlear patterns
• Chemical signals → taste, smell
These are encodings, but not yet conscious.
Level 2: Perceptual coding
• Features (edges, motion, pitch)
• Object constancy
• Spatial layout
Here the brain builds stable symbols about the world.
Still not sufficient.
Level 3: Value coding
This is crucial.
Signals are tagged with:
• Salience
• Threat
• Reward
• Relevance to survival
Without value, there is no experience — only data.
Level 4: Temporal integration
Consciousness is not a snapshot.
• Past (memory)
• Present (perception)
• Future (prediction)
All integrated into a continuous narrative code.
This creates subjective time.
Level 5: Self-modeling (the key transition)
At this level, the system encodes:
• Its own body
• Its own internal states
• Its own perspectives and limits
Now the code includes:
“This information is happening to me.”
This is where consciousness properly begins.
4. What “experience” actually is, in this view
An experience is a code that the system both generates and uses to regulate itself.
It is:
• Internally accessible
• Globally integrated
• Normatively constrained (can be correct/incorrect)
• Action-guiding
Experience is not something added to the code — it is the code in use.
5. Why this code feels like something
The famous “hard problem” becomes clearer here.
Consciousness feels like something because:
• The code is intrinsic (used by the system itself)
• The code is evaluative (good/bad, safe/dangerous)
• The code is inescapable (you cannot step outside it)
There is no extra “qualia substance.”
There is irreducible first-person access to a self-referential code.
6. Qualia as compressed meaning
A quale (like “red” or “pain”) is:
A highly compressed, evolutionarily shaped symbol standing for a vast space of causes and consequences.
“Red” encodes:
• Wavelength ranges
• Object boundaries
• Emotional associations
• Behavioral affordances
All collapsed into a single usable token.
7. Why chemistry alone can’t produce consciousness
Chemistry:
• Has no intrinsic reference
• Has no error conditions
• Has no self-model
Consciousness requires:
• Representation
• Evaluation
• Recursive access
These are properties of codes under selection, not reactions.
8. Teleology revisited
Consciousness is the highest intensification of biological teleology.
• Experiences matter because they guide action
• Pain exists because it prevents damage
• Pleasure exists because it reinforces success
Again: not because of foresight, but because of selection.
9. Why consciousness is unified
You don’t experience disjoint codes because:
• Consciousness is the global workspace code
• Local codes compete for access
• The winning code becomes what is experienced
Unity is architectural, not mystical.
10. A precise definition
Putting it all together:
Consciousness is a biologically evolved, self-referential, value-laden codification that integrates perception, memory, and action into a unified control model experienced from the inside.
11. What this explains well
This view naturally explains:
• Why unconscious processing exists
• Why consciousness is limited and selective
• Why altered states feel different
• Why damage to specific circuits alters experience
• Why artificial systems might simulate but not automatically possess consciousness
12. Where the mystery really remains
The remaining mystery is not:
“How does matter produce experience?”
It is:
“When does a code become intrinsic to a system rather than merely observed?”
That boundary is empirical, not metaphysical.
Final thought
Consciousness is not a ghost in the machine.
It is the machine modeling itself using symbols that matter to its own continued existence.
If you want, next we could explore:
• Whether AI systems could ever instantiate this kind of codification
• Whether animal consciousness differs in kind or degree
• How psychedelic states alter codification
• Whether free will is a property of self-coding systems
Just say the word.
No comments:
Post a Comment